MN v. Derek Michael Chauvin Trial - DR. ANDREW BAKER - MEDICAL EXAMINER, HENNEPIN CO. - CROSS

HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA - APRIL 9: 16:19:11 that is correct i believe it was issued on june 1, did you conversate with prosecutors about the findings? i dont recall but im sure i would tell them those findings, do you recall calling it a fatal level of fentanyl? in other circumstances yes, do you recall the pulmonary edema cause being fentanyl? its confounded by the fact mr floyd had a lot of cpr so i find the pulmonary edema insiginificant, do you recall saying if you found mr floyd in other circumstances you wouldve said it was an overdose? i dont recall what was said but it went something like this if mr floyd was alone and the only autopsy finding was the fentanyl yes i would say that but its very context dependant, were you able to form an opinion of the involvement of police officers if mr floyd would have died under these circumstances? there weremultiple people on these video calls there was more than one or more people asking questions i clarified for the us attorney to my opinion that he experienced a cardiopulmonary arrest in the context of law enforcement it was that interaction that stressed him and it was clarified in a letter ebcause of the confusion 16:22:46 (Footage by Law&Crime via Getty Images)